@Stuffed_Suits on Twitter

Banner

Must Read Stuff

Banner

Related Articles

Banner

Share this page with your friends

Facebook Twitter Digg Delicious Stumbleupon Google Bookmarks RSS Feed 

National Politics

Before I introduce myself, I want you to take a quick look at the chart below. I know. I know. It feels a lot like homework. But I promise there will be no pop quizzes at the end.

The House Ways and Means committee put together this little diddy.

Before

Now

Change

Number of Unemployed1

12.0 Million

13.1 Million

+9%

Long-Term Unemployed2

2.7 Million

5.6 Million

+107%

Unemployment Rate3

7.8%

8.5%

+9%

“High Unemployment” States4

22

43

+95%

Misery Index5

7.83

11.46

+46%

Price of Gas6

$1.85

$3.39

+83%

“Typical” Monthly Family Food Cost7

$974

$1,013

+4%

Median Value of Single-Family Home8

$196,600

$169,100

-14%

Rate of Mortgage Delinquencies9

6.62%

10.23%

+55%

U.S. National Debt10

$10.6 Trillion

$15.2 Trillion

+43%

 

I don’t know about you, but when I look at that chart I frankly get scared to death.  And then I get angry.  My name is Donlyn Turnbull and I am a passionate conservative blogger.  I write for my own sites, www.donlynturnbull.com and www.dirtysexandpolitics.com (18+ only!) .  I’m also a new contributor to www.BigGovernment.com and happily now a contributor to the quite awesome Stuffed Suits as well.

I like to describe my writing and myself the following two ways.  First of all, I am fluent in metaphor, sarcasm with a nerd dialect.  And if you ever read Dave Barry, I consider myself the political girl version and only slightly less cool.

In my own way, I’m standing on my soap box shouting out to the nation, “Wake up America”.  Your very freedoms and liberties are being stripped from you on almost a daily basis.   But the main stream media and not to mention some of the conservative media, are not painting a clear picture of the dangers our country is truly in.

I like to think of myself as a purveyor of truth. I look long and hard to expose the misgivings of the Left and their agenda.  And I’m not going to rest a minute until Obama and his cronies are exiled from the White House forever.

So, I lift my glass in your honor and shout with all my might “Beer for the men (and women!) And whiskey for the horses.”  Because I have a feeling that’s what it’s going to take to get us through this next year of President Obama.

Looking forward to fighting the good fight with you!

Donlyn

 

 

 



Dear Thomas,

Coming off my strong finish in Iowa, I’m expecting another in Tuesday’s New Hampshire Primary.

My hope is this will help me build on our incredible momentum as we head into South Carolina, Florida, and Nevada.

In fact, I’ve decided to make a whistle-stop in Columbia this Wednesday, January 11, at noon to rally my supporters and show the strength of my campaign in South Carolina.

Can I count on you to be there?

As you know, I’ve led the fight against Big Government in Congress for years by simply staying true to my oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and protect our God-given rights.

Today, I’m running for President because I believe the best way to get our economy moving again is not with bailouts, higher taxes, or another failed “stimulus package.”

Instead, we need to slash federal spending, cut taxes and regulation, and reestablish limited government, free markets, and sound money in America
.

Now, there’s no denying that my message of liberty and constitutional government is resonating with the American people.

In fact, recent polls show me climbing in South Carolina!

That’s why I hope you’ll join me for a rally in Columbia this Wednesday, January 11, at noon.

The rally will take place at the Columbian Metropolitan Airport at the Eagle Aviation Building, located at 2700 Aviation Way in West Columbia.

You can get directions HERE.

I hope to see you there.

For Liberty,


Ron Paul

P.S. I’m having a rally this Wednesday, January 11, in Columbia, to rally my supporters and show the strength of my campaign in South Carolina.

The rally will take place at the Columbian Metropolitan Airport at the Eagle Aviation Building, located at 2700 Aviation Way in West Columbia.

You can get directions HERE.

I hope to see you there.






Paid for by Ron Paul 2012 Presidential Campaign Committee

www.ronpaul2012.com

In his recent diatribe against GOP hopeful and former Senator Rick Santorum, “Pulitzer Prizewinning journalist” Gene Robinson is at it again. Lambasting earlier leading candidates, Gene Robinson has now set his rhetorical sites on Rick. Since Gene is open with his far-Left ideology, I don’t fault him for the inevitable criticism of conservative candidates. That’s part of our marketplace of ideas, and most readers understand his Liberal bias. However, when Gene fabrication “facts” through mistruths or distortions, it’s time someone called him on it. In the case of Rick Santorum, I’m calling him on it.
According to Gene Robinson, Senator Santorum “is a culture warrior who has equated same-sex marriage with polygamy, pedophilia, and bestiality.” Absolutely false assertion, yet repeated by many of the Left to become truth to many. The 2003 Lawrence v. Texas Supreme Court decision undermined earlier Supreme Court precedence and arguably established a Constitutional protection of any kind of consensual sex act. In Lawrence, the issue was local legislation preventing homosexual sexual acts. However, in its opinion, the Court not only undermined state and local sovereignty with a new Constitutional right, but went beyond homosexual sex to all consensual sex.
Rick Santorum, a law school graduate who practiced law before election to Congress, discussed the potential ramifications of the Lawrence opinion. Rick wanted Americans to understand the opinion went beyond homosexual sex to possibly include polygamous sex, bestiality and pedophilia. He did not even speak about gay marriage, but gay sex. He did not equate the types of sex, and impliedly spoke of bestiality and pedophilia as much more egregious than homosexual sex. Unfortunately, the nuances of the argument go above the heads of our “elite” journalists, and they take the simplistic but untruthful approach. Helps sell papers, right? Unfortunately, the perpetuation of this lies continues to gather steam.
In using a “half-truth” to mislead the readers, Gene claimed Senator Santorum “opposes birth control”. Though that statement carries 1% truth (as I’ll explain), the clear impression is one of Rick Santorum desiring to outlaw contraception in America. More of the hysterics to sell newspapers and lambast the GOP field.
The truth is more complex. During an ABC interview in October 2011, Senator Santorum reiterated his position on contraception: “It is not a constitutional right, the state has the right to pass whatever statutes they have.” Rick Santorum is one of the staunchest pro-life politicians in America. For some time, he has spoken about the travesty of the Supreme Court’s 1967 “Griswald” opinion. In that case the Supreme Court had to determine whether or not states could regulate contraception. Unfortunately, in the majority opinion the Court went beyond contraception and “discovered” a new universal Constitutional right to privacy. Though not found in the Bill of Rights, the Court claimed that “penumbras and emanations” from the Bill of Rights granted this reversal of almost two centuries of Supreme Court precedence. The Federal Government no longer had to find its mandate to power in the Constitution, but could make it up.
Senator Santorum’s primary problem with the Griswald opinion was that the “penumbras and emanations” language was cited to justify the Constitutional “right” to abortion in Roe v. Wade only six years later. Therefore, in addition to the problems Griswald created with further empowerment of the Federal Government at the expense of the states, it greatly assisted abortion. In the interest of cutting spending to the bone to control our national debt, Senator Santorum does want to end federal funding of both abortion and contraception. He has stated many times he believes contraception to be a state issue. That said, it is clearly one that will not be outlawed by the states. As a devout Catholic, Rick personally follows Church teachings on contraception. However, he will not seek to outlaw it and has no history of trying to ban contraception. That’s just poppy-cock!
The radical Left in America, personified by journalists like Gene Robinson, are a reason our nation is in the state we find it. In reporting on complex positions, like those held by Rick Santorum, they seek to go beyond legitimate critique. They continue lies and half-truth to brand good men like Rick Santorum as, in the words of Robinson: “far-right fringe… a nice-guy zealot who should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval office.” Isn’t it amazing that Gene’s hero, President Obama, who has sped the nation toward near depression and depravity, is considered “mainstream” to Gene. While a thoughtful man of conscience like Rick Santorum is the “fringe”. Our founders would be rolling in their graves. It’s time we took back our nation in November.
Sola fide,

Bill Connor

 

A lot has been made in the press of the dramatic results of the Iowa Caucus held Tuesday night but it really was an insignificant event in the grand scheme of Presidential nominations.  That statement is generally true historically but it is even more so this year because of the new delegate rules in effect this election cycle.  The candidates and campaigns need to keep this in mind as they make decisions about their strategy.

This year the Republican National Committee has established a new paradigm for selecting the Presidential nominee.  They have changed the rules in several ways that dilute the effect of the primaries in the early states.  This is particularly ironic because the drama we all endured in setting the primary dates may turn out to be very anticlimactic under the new rules and may even have served to reduce the importance of the early states.

This year all primaries held before April 1, 2012 will assign their delegates to the National Convention to the candidates proportionate to the popular votes they receive in the primary.  There are 34 states or territories that will be included in proportional delegate assignments.  In other words the winner does not take all the delegates and will not be able to quickly pull away from the rest of the field so the race will stay competitive much longer this year.

Additionally New Hampshire, South Carolina, Florida, Michigan and Arizona are being penalized by reducing their delegate counts by 50% because they held their primaries before March 6, 2012.  So the impact of wins or good results in those states will be even further diluted.

Iowa and New Hampshire are both little states with few delegates to the Republican National Convention; Iowa 28 and New Hampshire 12.  (Iowa gets their full allotment of delegates even though they went early because their caucuses are not even binding on the delegates at the Convention.)  So right now (January 6, 2012) there are 28 non-committed delegates in play which are distributed thus: Romney has 6, Santorum has 6, Paul has 6, Gingrich has 4 and Perry has 3 the rest are unassigned.  Obviously those results are hardly worth mentioning.  It is like getting excited because the horse you bet on is ahead by a neck coming out of the gates and there are two other horses right with it.

To put this in perspective there are 2,286 delegates to the convention.  The eventual nominee needs a majority, 50% plus one, of the delegates to win. The three leaders coming out of Iowa each have 0.262% of the delegates to be awarded at the convention.  It is definitely too early for any of the candidates to beat their chest in victory but it is also too early for candidates to give up on their dream at least to the extent they are basing the decision on the delegate count.

In this age of 24 hour news networks, instant communication and ubiquitous internet access there is an insatiable demand for a story and not just a story but an exciting, history-making story.  So when Rick Santorum manages to garner 6 delegates it is breaking news and we have a dogfight between him and Romney.  Never mind that Ron Paul also has 6 and Gingrich is only down 2 that is not a story.

 

Rich Bolen

Chairman, Lexington County Republican Party

Well,  it was an exciting night for the top tier candidates in the Iowa caucuses.  I've always liked the idea of caucuses vs. primaries due to the fact that too many voters do not pay proper attention and consider it their duty to pull a lever, no matter how little they have educated themselves about the candidates.  This does not make for good governance.  Primaries, which are held like regular elections, are also much more expensive and tend to favor establishment candidates who have raised more money that God to plaster their names on the airwaves like a Coca-Cola ad campaign.  Such tactics make it harder to pick the real thing when there's that much froth floating at the top of the process.

Ron Paul was the very narrow favorite going in and led slightly according to the entrance polls.  In the poll results, though, Romney wound up very narrowly taking the caucus just above the recently surging Santorum who finished second which, in this case, was a virtual tie.  At 22% Paul finished 3rd just three percentage points behind Romney and Santorum's 25% each share of the vote.

Paul's third place finish may have disappointed some of his supporters, no doubt, but the difference between now and four years ago in Iowa is like night and day.  Instead of being firmly planted in the next-to-nothing crowd, Paul made the establishment media say his name over and over again last night.  They had no choice this time.  They could not blank him out as they attempted back in the Iowa straw poll when he finished within 1% of first with the now faded Michele Bachmann.

Ron Paul has bucked the traditional Whig faction of the GOP establishment. Due especially to demographics of older, statist voters, many supporters of the big government GOP are caught up in the delusion that we can nip and tuck to disguise our country's massive economic deformities when major surgery is what is needed and what Ron Paul can deliver.  Indeed, the only way to insure that social programs such as their social security and medicare can be protected for those already dependent on it is to save a trillion dollars a year by bringing our troops home protecting other (wealthy) countries and put them on our border.  We need to slowly shrink the size of our military which, with a common sense redeployment and build up of infrastructure on our borders, would actually increase the soundness of our national defense strategy and help our own economy tremendously.

After being viciously ignored and dismissed, lately even more than Ron Paul has been, Santorum had the stars in his favor last night.  There was definitely some potential for his receiving some love from some GOP voters last night.  Santorum has a straight establishment platform that is very heavy on the social issues.  As this writer has commented on several times, social issues such as abortion have been used for decades now to distinguish big spending Republicans from big spending Democrats.  If the GOP ever follows through on resolving the abortion issue (returning it to the states is the only current legal remedy unless a Constitutional amendment is successfully passed) it is going to make it a lot harder for big spending GOP candidates to explain exactly how they are different from big spending Democrats.

Santorum, however, I think would make an honest effort to do something on abortion and perhaps pursue some other social issues.  My main disagreement with him is having to listen to his version of John McCain's non-hit remake of the Beach Boys' "Barbara Ann:" "Bomb, bomb, bomb--bomb, bomb Iran!"  Like other failing empires of the past, we can't afford to continue to be the policemen of the world even if every moral argument in the world were to support the concept--and they don't.  (If we'd quit micromanaging Israel, they could take care of the problem as they did with Syria in the 1980s.)  But then, Santorum's belligerence does not make him that much different from the other candidates except for Ron Paul.  The GOP establishment has a lot to love in his support of the taxpayer funded corporate warfare machine.   Whether they follow through or not is another matter entirely.

Santorum's biggest advantage last night is that, timing wise, he fell into the sweet zone of benefiting from Gingrich's massive fallout of voters and before any real rise in the polls gave other candidates and the press the initiative to really examine him and his record.  It was mostly dumb luck that, I'm sure, his campaign people will make much hay from but that they don't deserve much credit for.  If the bloviating Gingrich had peaked one or two weeks later than he did, Santorum would have still done much better than expected but would have battled it out with Gingrich for third place.  Santorum should now be preparing for a very large probe.  It won't be pretty and, before it's all done, he may be wishing it were aliens instead of the press supervising the procedure.

Santorum, though, is no Gingrich.  He's not even a Herman Cain.  I predict Santorum will stand up to scrutiny of his exemplary personal life and, despite disagreements with many on political matters, will, like Ron Paul and Mitt Romney, prove to be of outstanding character.  Good character, after all, should be the first (but not only) requirement for being president.

Where Santorum may suffer greatly--or not, depending on the perception of the voters--is his voting record which is heavy on big government and light on fiscal reform.  If Santorum proves to be too much like Romney in this regard, he may soon be just another falling star in the GOP meteor showers of 2011-2012.  Santorum probably won't be able to break Romney's solid lock on the big government liberal establishment of the GOP.  If the tea party folks and fiscal conservatives in other parts of the country aren't impressed with his voting record, he'll lose their support or never gain it to begin with.  But, for now, Rick Santorum is definitely in the game.

Santorum's newfound attention will gain him more money in the short term but he's now scrambling to get boots on the ground.  His longshot candidacy might pay off due to his "turn at bat" for the GOP alternative to Romney or Paul, but only if he very quickly overcomes the lack of good organization.

That leads to another point that might not be realized by many of us who are not all that familiar with the Iowa caucus system.  It turns out that what we saw last night was, in essence, just another straw poll of sorts.  The Iowa caucus results are not binding and that's where extra work by the Ron Paul campaign might pay off later depending on how well he does in accumulating the delegates from other states.  According to an article in the Business Insider, Ron Paul may have won the Iowa caucuses without anyone realizing it.

True or not, helpful or not in the end to the Ron Paul campaign, this is an interesting tactic and may show how a serious organization that thinks on its feet may be able to beat other candidates' massive amounts of money in the strategies used to become the nominee for the GOP:

Business Insider: Ron Paul May Have Secretly Won The Iowa Caucuses
Grace Wyler
Jan. 4, 2012

DES MOINES — Ron Paul may have officially come in third tonight, but if the campaign's caucus strategy went off as planned, then Paul may actually be the real winner of the first Republican voting contest.

That's because Paul's massive organizational push in Iowa focused on both winning votes, and also on making sure that Paul supporters  stuck around after the vote to make sure they were selected as county delegates — the first step towards being elected as a delegate to the Republican National Convention.

That's because Iowa's Republican caucuses are non-binding — they are technically just a straw poll, so once selected, delegates are free to vote for whichever presidential candidate they choose. . . .

Please read the rest of the article by clicking here: http://www.businessinsider.com

 

Two articles from the Washington Post that seem to fairly summarize much of what is going on with Paul and Santorum camps:

Ron Paul looks to capi­tal­ize on top-tier Iowa finish

Santorum hopes strong Iowa finish will spark campaign’s next phase

 

UPDATES: It looks as though Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, and Rick Santorum will each be awarded 7 delegates from Iowa according to CNN estimates based on the votes, at least making the delegate race a theoretical three-way tie for first.  Again, the delegates are not committed so that it is possible that Ron Paul will indeed benefit from having more potential delegates due to the tenacity of his supporters.  Also, Bachmann has officially suspended her campaign and it looks as though Perry will do so as well.  This will shake up the numbers and percentages as readjustments occur.  More than likely, those supporters will gravitate to Paul and Santorum if the momentum of both continue.  The wild card is Newt who may be stronger in South Carolina than estimates show.  How that affects the results remains to be seen.